Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT)
and Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE)
These two
procedures are considered state of the art by the
majority of hair restoration surgeons worldwide.
Follicular
Unit Transplantation
This procedure
involves removing a strip of hair from the back of
the head (the permanent donor hair) and dividing it
under a microscope into “follicular
units”.
This hair is then
planted into small needle holes. About 60 or 70
grafts can be planted per square centimeter,
allowing for a density that approaches that of
naturally grown hair. When the procedure is done
properly, it will produce a completely natural
appearance. By "properly", I mean that the graft
density is full, and that the hairline has been
designed accurately and with aesthetic
consideration. I had an FUT procedure done in
February of 2006, and have provided some pre- and
post-op photos of myself to show how natural this
procedure can look on my website.
Many patients
voice concern about the scar left across the donor
site with this procedure. A new closure technique
used by some physicians, called “Trichophitic
closure”,
allows the hair to grow through the scar, making the
scar almost invisible.
If you go to my
site at
www.drrobertjones.com, you can see a diagram
of how the Trichophytic closure technique works.
Follicular Unit
Transplantation is the procedure suitable for most
hair transplant candidates. In experienced hands, it
will provide a completely natural result.
Follicular Unit Extraction
In 2002, I caught
wind of a doctor in Australia who was performing
hair restoration surgery without cutting a strip out
of the back of the patient’s
head. I called this doctor and asked him if I could
visit and observe his practice, but he refused to
have me. Curiosity got the better of me, so I
started to experiment using different methods of
removing grafts without a scalpel. I can remember
the first attempt –
it took me four hours to remove 75 grafts! Within a
year I had perfected, and was performing, a
technique whereby I could remove up to 1,000 grafts
in a day. My notoriety grew as word spread of this
new scar-free hair transplant technique, and soon I
was teaching the technique to doctors from South
America, Europe, America and Asia. I also had the
privilege of showing doctors at major international
conferences my technique, and now, doctors around
the world are using it.
The
concept is simple. Grafts are removed using a tiny
punch, which varies its depth and angle according to
the follicle. Once the punch releases the graft, it
can easily be removed with forceps. The downside of
this technique is that it requires a lot of work and
practice on the part of the doctor, as removing the
grafts can be quite difficult in some patients, and
it requires the patient to buzz their head. (For
women or men with long hair, you can get away with
buzzing just a strip on the back of the head to use
as a donor area). I have now performed enough FUE
procedures that I can easily extract 1,500 to 2,000
grafts in one day, but it is an incredibly tedious
and time-consuming procedure, and it is for this
reason that it is so expensive –
two to three times as expensive as an FUT.
Another advantage of FUE is the possibility of
extracting body hair. When performing an FUT on a
patient with a limited donor site, I often remove
several hundred hairs from the body (chest, abdomen,
back, etc.), allowing for more hair to be
transplanted. It is a last resort for patients with
minimal hair in donor sites on the head.
FUE
heals very quickly. I have some photos on my site
showing the healing over one week of the donor site
with FUE.
FUE is not the
answer for all patients, but it certainly has its
place in modern hair restoration surgery.
Who should
consider spending the extra money on an FUE
procedure?
1. Patients who
like to keep their hair shorter that 2 mm.
2. Patients who
want eyebrow transplants where fine single hair
grafts need to be selected for the best aesthetic
result.
3. Patients who
require the repair of a previous transplant’s
scar using body hair FUE. I have used this with
great success on a number of patients.
4. Patients who
refuse to have strip surgery. Some patients simply
don’t want
to have a linear scar under any circumstance.
.